"Limerence is an involuntary cognitive and emotional state characterized primarily by intrusive thinking, longing for reciprocation, and sensitivity to external events that signify uncertainty on the one hand, and hope of reciprocation on the other. It can be experienced as intense joy or as extreme despair, depending on the perceived behavior of the "limerent object," the person whose returned feeling is desired."
Essentially, limerence is what many people would call "romantic love," or "being in love." It is argued that limerence is a completely separate phenomenon from "true love," although they may occur at the same time. I would also posit that the "limerent object," or LO, would be the same as the "one-itis" that we hear spoken of in the PUA community. Hence the reason I feel this topic belongs in my blog.
First off, allow me to say that there is a notable percentage of the population who have never been limerent. That is not to say that they are incapable of it, although I would certainly guess that such people do exist. So to those of you who have never experienced this phenomenon, I say "bully for you." Personally, I've been limerent more times than I can remember, although admittedly, a great number of those times occurred between the ages of about 10 and 16. Girly crushes and infatuations, mostly, so no big deal. But ever since I started actually consummating my infatuations, limerence has become a more important experience. My focus as of late, however, has been in heading the opposite way, that is to say, avoiding limerence like the plague.
Let's face it, anything that takes over your senses to the extent that limerence does, that makes you see someone's failings and yet make excuses for them all day long, anything that essentially, robs you of your sanity, however temporarily, as limerence does, is NOT a good thing when trying to keep a cool head and practice seduction. How, then, does one who is known to be capable of limerence, avoid the dreaded "one-itis"?
I cannot speak to all occasions, to all people, or even to all members of one gender. The book does not address this topic. But I did want to share how I've handled it thus far (and with what I consider to be success). The first and more obvious part of the equation is to detach from the outcome. This is something that PUA drills into everyone quite thoroughly. What I learned from the more subtle seduction side of things, however, is something I consider even more valuable: make a study of your prey. Know them better than they know themselves. Learn their foibles, their imperfections, their buttons and their baggage. Then, accept them, and love them anyway.
See, a limerent person sees their LO's imperfections, but ignores, dismisses or makes excuses for them. The seducer sees their LO's imperfections, and holds them very clearly in focus. They are among the best tools the seducer has in their arsenal: use the victim's weaknesses against them. Because you're spending so much time with their less glorious traits right in front of your face, you know from the start that this person is human, fallible, and not worthy of the worship implied in limerence. True, the experience of limerence is capable of bringing you to otherwise unattainable heights, but it can also bring you low more quickly and more often than any sane human should want. So by focusing on someone's faults, and yet accepting them, and finding the things about the person that are worth loving and appreciating, you avoid the insanity of limerence, and are capable of controlling not only your feelings for them, but also theirs for you.
Can this backfire? I suppose so. In an upcoming post, however, I'll be sharing just how nice it can be to skip over the BS of limerence, and move straight into the deeper, more rewarding kind of love of which two humans are capable.